David Eby - Attorney General of BC (former), Ministry of Attorney General
2909 West Broadway
Vancouver, BC V6K 2G6
David Eby was the Attorney General of BC for much of the time while these prosecutions were occurring. He is now the Premier of BC (the equivalent of a Governor).
The Attorney General is the person above the BC Prosecution Service. The BC Prosecution Service is who the prosecutors work for. So, David Eby was the top, top boss of all of those evil, vile, lying, cheating, sleazy, despicable prosecutors. While Eby was the Attorney General, I had sent him a number of letters informing him of the corruption and misconduct occurring in my cases, on the part of the prosecutors. Not because I expected him to do anything about it, but so that later when I publish all of this he cannot say he was not aware of what was going on.
The 'Dear David Eby' Article
On 2020-08-19, I posted an article on this website entitile "Dear David Eby".
The article was written as an open letter to Eby, mocking him, the BC Prosecution Service (BCPS), and the entire BC justice system for failing to force me to take down these websites.
The article pointed out that for more than a year I've been demanding the BCPS prosecute me for criminal harassment again because the Desiree Capuano website was still online, but that they have, thus far, refused to do so. I said, if the website constituted criminal harassment in 2017, such that I could be convicted and sentenced to three years in prison for it, then surely it must still be criminal harassment now. If Capuano was being so tormented and traumatized by it up to 2017, then surely she must still be so. Isn't it the duty of the BC justice system to protect so-called "vulnerable" people like Capuano from ongoing victimization by people like me?
The article goes on to suggest that the real reason the BCPS adamantly refuses to prosecute me for criminal harassment again is because that would result in a new jury trial, at which all the proof of all the perjury Capuano committed at the first trial would be presented to the jury. She would have no credibility. She would be exposed to the jury as being a lying, manipulating, sociopath who was actually, deliberately provoking me and actually, actively trying to keep me engaging in hostile arguments with her so she could get me to say things she could use against me. She admitted as much on cross-examination at the first trial TR 2017-06-14 p50l36-p51l4.
And, presenting the proof of all that perjury to the jury would also result in presenting the proof that the prosecutor (Mark Myhre) and court appointed defense lawyer (Tony Lagemaat) knew Capuano was committing perjury, but they refused to inform the judge or the jury. In other words, they were complicit in Capuano's perjury.
I would think you would think "So what. In Canada, every person has the inalienable right to criticize the government and to expose the corruption and misconduct of justice system participants." Yes, and that is the fairy tale you're supposed to accept. That is what the hypocritical Canadian government keeps repeating as they're criticizing countries like Saudi Arabia, Russia, and China for imprisoning people for speaking out against the government. But the reality is very different than the rhetoric.
Following the publishing of the article, I was arrested and charged with violating the conditions of a probation order imposed by Judge Nancy Phillips, by failing to take down the Desiree Capuano website (on which the article also appeared) Probation Order, Condition 3.
Although the BCPS officially claimed the charge was based on my failure to take down the Desiree Capuano website, in order to protect Capuano from ongoing harassment, their comments at the trials show they really were more concerned with making me take down the "Dear David Eby" article. For example, at the 2020-11-26 trial, only one page from the website was offered as an exhibit - the "Dear David Eby" article. No mention was made of any other content on the website.
When the prosecutor Chris Johnson was examining his only witness, Vancouver Police Detective Kyle Dent, the only page of the website which was discussed was the "Dear David Eby" article TR 2020-11-26 p7l3-p9l32.
And during that discussion of the "Dear David Eby" article, Johnson explicitly referenced to particular quotes from it:
Anyway, on August 19, 2020 I had a trial for a probation violation for putting this website back online (publishing, disseminating information about Capuano). And even though the Crown's (Chris Johnson) only witness (VPD Detective Jennifer Fontana) and Crown himself both admitted they had no knowledge or evidence of when I published the material, etc.
And:
I told Mr. Johnson all this is doing is showing the world how ineffectual and impotent the Canadian justice system is. They can't even make a little pissant nobody like myself take down a website. They can lock me up for the rest of my life, but I will never take down the website.
It seems to me, if the purpose of the probation condition was to prevent me from continuing to harass Capuano with the website, then there should have been at least some mention of her actually being harmed by the website still being online. But there wasn't.
It also seems to me, as I had brought up during the trial, that that article had aboslutely no relevance to the issue of harassing or harming Capuano TR 2020-11-26 p17l26-37; p23l28-30.
So why did the prosecutor focus on it so much at the trial? Because it proved the BC justice system was impotent and ineffectual. And because it made them look like chumps.
And the Canadian news media made some references to the "Dear David Eby" article as well.
A week after the article was posted, Keith Fraser mentioned it in an article he wrote for the Vancouver Sun, about one of my recent convictions Man who ran campaign of harassment against ex-wife convicted of breach of probation.
CityNews ran a story, following my September 2020 arrest, wherein they mentioned the "Dear David Eby" article Burnaby man facing new charges over revenge website targeting ex-wife.
And, of course, CBC had to throw in their feminist two cents, in an article they ran following my arrest following the publishing of the "Dear David Eby" article B.C. man facing new charges over revenge website targeting ex-wife.
So, apparently, that "Dear David Eby" article really pissed off a lot of people in the BC government.
Correspondence
While I was in custody, fighting all those probation violation cases, I sent Eby a number of letters. My main objective in that was to ensure Eby was aware of the bullshit going on within the BCPS and the justice system in general, so he wouldn't be able to later claim he had no knowlege of it.
Eby did not respond to, or take any action in response to, any of these letters. However, to be fair, in July 2024, I forwarded a copy of my most recent correspondence with the BCPS, regarding their refusal to disclose why they were refusing to prosecute me for criminal harassment based on the Desiree Capuano website still being online, to every member of the BC Legislative Assembly email to BC MLAs, 2024-07-18. Three weeks later, on 2024-08-08, the BCPS finally fully disclosed the reasons - after years of stonewalling and refusing. Did Eby have a hand in that, or was it one or more of the other 92 members of the Legislature? Who knows?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
From:Patrick FoxTo:AG BCPS Information and Privacy AG:EX (BC Prosecution Service)2024-08-08
2:05 PM
-
-
-
-