[Proof that my actions have been long-term and deliberate]; Court of Appeal no. CA48145 [Patrick Fox; Mila Shah (BCPS)]

Dear Miss Shah:

Now that the appeal in this matter is complete, I shall disclose a few points that I would think you should find interesting.

At the trial, before Judge Denhoff, the judge and Crown Counsel Chris Johnson, insisted that I had changed my story, regarding my involvement (or lack thereof) in publishing the website, from what I had told the police in my various "interviews" to what I was now claiming on the witness stand. Judge Denhoff insisted that it was because just before taking the stand I realized my "new" claims would be "less incriminating". And Denhoff was very, very clear that she did not believe my claims that I was deliberately antagonizing the police and prosecutors so they would prosecute me for criminal harassment based on the new website.

Now, I would like to turn your attention to the transcript of the trial in the matter of 244069-6-B (BCCA CA46979), the trial before Judge Phillips, which occurred a year and a half before the Denhoff trial. During my cross-examination of Det. Fontana, there are the following exchanges:

• At p37l25-30, I ask Fontana whethere it's reasonable to say that it is entirely possible that, while I was in custody in 2018, someone other than me put the website online.
• At p38l37-46, I ask Fontana if she has any knowledge of whether I put the website online or somebody else did it, either on my behalf or completely independently of me.
• At p39l18-21, I ask Fontana if it is her understanding that I wanted to be prosecuted for criminal harassment based on the new website. She said, yes.
• At p39l22-29, I ask Fontana if it is her belief that I have been saying and/or doing things deliberately to antagonize the police and the Crown to prosecute me for criminal harassment based on the new website. She agreed.
• At p39l30-43, I ask Fontana if she believes it is reasonable that perhaps I have been saying things to the police, the Crown, and the judges which may not have been true, in order to provoke the justice system to prosecute me for criminal harassment based on the new website.

The statements and references I was making to Fontana at the Phillips trial (a year and a half before the Denhoff trial) are completely, 100% consistent with what I testified at the Denhoff trial. Curious, huh? And, you may notice, the Phillips trial occurred BEFORE my interviews by Det. Kyle Dent (202-09-17) and Det. Janine Tanino (2021-08-17).

I'll let you and your colleagues draw your own (likely incorrect) conclusions about why I put the time and effort into writing this letter.

Since I don't have the ability to make photocopies at NFPC, would you be kind enough to ensure Patti Tomasson receives a copy?

Thank you.

cc Niki Sharma