Legal Battles - Canada vs Patrick Fox - Correspondence
Contact
Patrick Fox
Torrance, CA     90503
fox@patrickfox.org

R. v. Patrick Fox; Court of Appeal no CA47391 [Patrick Fox; David Layton (BCPS)]

On Sat, Jul 23, 2022, Patrick Fox wrote:
Patrick Fox
1451 Kingsway Ave
Port Coquitlam, BC
V3C 1S2
July 23, 2022
Attn:
David Layton
BC Prosecution Service
865 Hornby Street, 6th Floor
Vancouver, BC V6Z 2G3
Re:
R. v. Patrick Fox;
Court of Appeal no CA47391

Dear Mr. Layton:

In reply to your letter dated 2022-07-20:

1.
Somehow, when I read your letter dated 2022-06-22, I completely missed the paragraph where you said you had reconsidered about the Crown obtaining the transcripts of the 2021-10-14 and 2021-12-23 appearances. That is entirely my mistake and I aologize. Obviously, that makes my request for the DARS recordings of those appearances moot.
2.

Regarding my application to cross-examine Johnson, I do still want to proceed with that.

If, at the 2022-06-16 CMC, I stated that if I have the transcripts I would not proceed with the cross-examination then I will honor that, and I will withdraw the application to cross-examine. However, I do believe what I had said was that if I don't have the transcripts then I will definitely want to cross-examine Johnson, whereas if I do have the transcripts then it may not be necessary to cross-examine him. Would you be willing to have one of your people confirm the exact wording I used?

Alternatively, if the BCPS will admit that Johnson repeatedly lied to the court in my proceedings and that he lied in his sworn/affirmed affidavit, and you withdraw his affidavit then I would see no need for the cross-examination and I would withdraw that application.

3.

Regarding the filing of the two additional transcripts and the RFJ, I do want them to be filed so that they can be used to attack Johnson's credibility, regardless of whether or not I cross-examine him (although this is only relevant as long as his affidavit is before the court).

With respect to Johnson's false claims at the 2021-10-14 appearance, about the disclosure material not being encrypted, I will also need to include a copy of those encrypted disclosure files (in order to prove his statements were actually false). I have copies of those but I'll need to figure out how to get them to you.

With respect to Johnson's false claims at the 2021-12-23 appearance, about the police requesting I provide them access, in my presence, to only the one email message I sent to editor@desicapuano.com on 2021-08-13, and not access to my entire email account by virtue of providing the police the passwords to my phone and laptop (TR 2021-12-23 p14l36-p15l17, p16l10-19, p16l28), I will also need to include a copy of the transcript of the VPD interrogation from 2021-08-17 (in order to prove his statements were actually false).

And again, I point out that you can save yourself, Johnson, and the court's time and effort by simply admitting that Johnson committed perjury by lying under oath in his affidavit, and that he knowingly and deliberately made false statements to the court with the intention of misleading the court at those two appearances and that for those reasons you do not believe he is credible and you believe: (a) his affidavit should be withdrawn; and (b) I should be given new trials in these matters.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Patrick Fox